Legal Opinion

Diamond Iron Works v. Werley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1925No. 19344. Department TwoPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

— In July, 1922, the respondent sold machinery under a conditional sale contract to the Willapa Harbor Lumber & Shingle Company. A memorandum of the sale was filed within the statutory time in the office of the auditor of Pacific county and was properly indexed as a conditional sale contract. This memorandum described the property as “machinery as per plans and specifications submitted herewith.” This memorandum consisted of the proposition from the respondent and signed by it, addressed to the Willapa Harbor Lumber & Shingle Company. The proposition as filed did not have attached any plans…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mendenhall v. KratzWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. MacCallum-Donahoe Finance Co. v. WarrenWashington Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Empire State Chair Co., Inc. v. BeldockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API