Legal Opinion

Worley v. Metropolitan Motor Car Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1913No. 10859PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Dykeman, J., entered August 22, 1912, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to foreclose a chattel mortgage.

1Opinion of the Court

Chadwick, J

Plaintiff loaned defendant $800, on the 26th of April, the money to be used as part payment on an automobile to be purchased from the appellant, the Metropolitan Motor Car Company, and to be secured by a mortgage thereon. The car was received by the appellant on the 26th day of May, and was delivered to defendant King on or about June 1st. Some time thereafter — the manager of the appellant company says a few days, the defendant King says sometime after June 28 — Mrs. King signed a conditional bill of sale contract. Plaintiff had ordered a chattel mortgage to be prepared. After…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Houser & Haines Manufacturing Co. v. HargroveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Fournier v. WilsonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1893
  3. Johnston v. WoodWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Wittler-Corbin Machinery Co. v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Geo. M. McDonald & Co. v. JohnsWashington Supreme Court · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ransom v. Wickstrom & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Smith v. AllenWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Jennings v. SchwartzWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Cook v. Washington-Oregon Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Long v. McAvoyWashington Supreme Court · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API