Legal Opinion

In Re Leuenberger

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 2004No. OSB 98-59; SC S50178PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar alleged that lawyer James E. Leuenberger (the accused) had violated Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rule (DR) 7-102(A)(1) (knowingly taking action that served merely to harass or maliciously injure another) (two counts); DR 7-102(A)(2) (knowingly advancing legally unwarranted claim or defense) (three counts); DR 7-106(C)(7) (intentionally violating established procedural rule) (two counts); DR 7-110(B)(2) and (3) (communicating with judge as to merits of cause, without promptly delivering copy of written…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HockettOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. In Re Complaint as to Conduct of DeversOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GustafsonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re McGrawOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CobbOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  3. In re DuBoffOregon Supreme Court · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API