Legal Opinion
Farrell v. City of Long Beach
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 11, 1955No. Civ. 20627PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
The question here posed is whether the complaint can be so amended as to state a cause of action based upon the negligence of the municipality.
Plaintiff alleges that he is a youth twelve years of age; that the city maintains the Somerset Playground on Carson Street and another on Cherry Avenue for children’s recreational purposes; that while he was at Somerset for the purpose of participating in children’s recreational activities, the city’s agent, Harold Fairly, negligently directed plaintiff “to proceed from said Somerset Playground to said playground located at 45th Street and Cherry…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bauman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Kellar v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Miller v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Stang v. City of Mill ValleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Plaza v. City of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Condemarin v. University HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Twente v. Ellis Fischel State Cancer HospitalMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Seybert v. County of ImperialCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Bartell v. Palos Verdes Peninsula Sch. Dist.California Court of Appeal · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.