Perri v. Beaumont
California Supreme Court
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County for want of proper proof of service of the notice of appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
The affidavit of service by mail states that a copy of a ivithin notice was deposited in the post-office at Sumner, California, postage thereon prepaid, addressed to Haggin & Dibble, attorneys for respondent, 45 Nevada Block, San Francisco, California, on February 8, 1890; that said attorneys reside at San Francisco, and the attorneys for appellant reside at Sumner, and that there is regular communication by mail between the two places.
The affidavit is uncertain as to the notice referred to; and as it was made on the 10th of February, 1890, it fails to show the places of residence of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Doerfler v. SchmidtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hellman v. ShoultersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Heinlen v. HeilbronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Knowlton v. MackenzieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- McMahon v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. MatthaiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.