Legal Opinion

Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. Matthai

California Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1897No. S. F. No. 528PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from, a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. D. J. Murphy» Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The appeal herein is from a judgment of foreclosure entered upon the default of the appellant. It is recited in the judgment that the defendants in the action were severally, personally, and duly served with the summons, together with a copy of the complaint, that the default of the appellant for not answering was duly entered, and that the cause came on regularly for trial by the court upon the complaint taken as confessed by her. The judgment-roll which is set out in the transcript as originally filed herein, did not contain a copy of the summons -with proof of service upon the appellant,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sichler v. LookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Herman v. SanteeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Drake v. DuvenickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Reinhart v. LugoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Knowlton v. MackenzieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Savage v. StokesIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
  2. National Diversified Services, Inc. v. BernsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. City & County of San Francisco v. CarraroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Jones v. GunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Turner v. Fidelity Loan ConcernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API