Larrick v. Hercules Powder Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Thiele, J.:
This appeal arises from a proceeding under the workmen’s compensation act, the principal question submitted being whether an award of compensation was prospective in operation so as to authorize proceedings for its review and modification, or, on the contrary was retrospective and final.
The record discloses that on June 1,1945, the workman sustained an accidental injury and made a claim for compensation which was heard on October 19, 1945. On December 19, 1945, the compensation commissioner approved an award for twenty-five compensable weeks…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gorrell v. BattelleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
- Richardson v. National Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933
- Sharp v. McColmSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
- Ketchell v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933
- Dobson v. Apex Coal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Angleton v. Foster Wheeler Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1954
- Dressler v. DresslerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
- Moore v. Dolese Brothers Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1951
- Meredith v. Shawver Graham, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1951
- Hardin v. Beck Mining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.