Legal Opinion

Sharp v. McColm

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 10, 1909No. 15,902PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Error from Ford district court; Gordon L. Finley, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The question for decision is whether the proceedings upon which a sheriff’s deed is based are void, and therefore open to collateral attack. The proceedings in question were brought in the district court of Ford county for the foreclosure of a mortgage given by Newton D. Wall and Jemima Wall to the Howard 'State Bank, of Howard, Kan., for $700, dated August 1, 1889, acknowledged August 17, 1889, and covering the east half of the northwest quarter and the east half of the southwest quarter of section nineteen, in township twenty-one south, of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Quarl v. AbbettIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Morrow v. WeedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856
  3. Cohen v. TrowbridgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  4. Clay v. Hildebrand Bros.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  5. Caldwell v. BiggerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Schultz v. StinerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  3. Galleher v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  4. Wood v. StewartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  5. Larrick v. Hercules Powder Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1948

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API