Legal Opinion
Gorrell v. Battelle
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided November 14, 1914No. 19,380PublishedCited by 47 opinions
Appeal from Franklin district court; Charles A. Smart, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by.
BURCH, j. :
The action was one for compensation under the workmen’s compensation act. (Laws 1911, ch. 218,- as amended by Laws 1913, ch. 216.) Compensation was awarded the plaintiff for partial incapacity to work, for the maximum period and in a lump sum. The defendant appeals.
The plaintiff alleged in his petition that the defendant had not filed with the secretary of state an election not to accept the terms of the workmen’s compensation act. The allegation was denied, and it is assigned as error that it was not proved at the trial.
Conceding for the…
2Cited by47 opinions
- Kemper v. GluckSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- Moore v. Peet Bros. Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- Hammett v. Vogue, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1942
- Steagall v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Ray's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1922
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.