Richardson v. National Refining Co.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This was an action for workmen’s compensation. Judgment was for the claimant. Respondent appeals.

Appellee was injured on May 17 by splashing some oil in his eye. He was treated by a doctor recommended by the insurance company. At the time of the hearing before the examiner a medical expert testified that the loss of vision of his eye was 99.9 per cent. While appellant argues some points with reference to the amount of compensation allowed, the question which is relied on for a reversal is that no written claim was filed within ninety days of…