Eastman v. Herrick
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
The plaintiff’s vehicle was one which by the statute (P. L., c. 90, s. 5) “whether stationary or in motion, on any public highway or bridge, shall have attached to it a light or lights, which shall be so displayed as to be visible from the front and rear” during the time of day from thirty minutes after sunset to thirty minutes before sunrise.
The claim that the plaintiff’s use of a flashlight was a substantial compliance with the statute is not sustained. It would disregard the order made positive and definite without qualification that the light shall be attached to the vehicle. The lighting…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Johnson v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
- Vidal v. ErrolSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1932
- Dillon v. Twin State Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1932
- Morrison v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933
- Clark v. HamptonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1929
3Cited by7 opinions
- Poulin v. ProvostSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- Frost v. StevensSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
- Putnam v. BowmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
- Hobbs v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
- Bosen v. LarrabeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.