Clark v. Hampton
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtPeaslee, C. J.
These suits are brought to recover for injuries suffered by the plaintiff in interest in the second action in an accident which occurred on or near a highway in Hampton. For convenience he is herein spoken of as the plaintiff.
The defendant moved for directed verdicts and claims that it could not be found that there was a defective bridge or a dangerous embankment requiring a railing, that if such defects did exist neither was any part of the cause of the accident, and that the plaintiff was not a traveler within the meaning of the statute of highways because the car in which he was riding was…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bourne v. WhitmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Gilman v. Central Vermont Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1919
- Goodman v. WilsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
- Farthing v. HepinstallMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Beaucage v. MercerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Fox v. LavenderUtah Supreme Court · 1936
- Gonchar v. KelsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Jones v. KasperIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941
- Moore v. SkilesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
- Forman v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.