Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 28, 1928PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeaslee, C. J.

“No person shall operate a motor vehicle upon any wiy nTTMs~State unless licensed.” (Laws 1921, c. 119, s. 8). The plaintiff was driving a car in violation of this statute, and the question is presented, whether his conduct was a legal wrong as to the defendant. “The true test will be found in a correct ascertainment of the legislative intention.” Lindell v. Stone, 77 N. H. 582, 585.

The mere fact that one is violating a statute when injured does not bar a recovery. If the violation had nothing to do with the accident, it is immaterial to the issue of responsibility. Wentworth v. Jefferson, 60…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bourne v. WhitmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Marino v. . LehmaierNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Buckley v. MeerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  4. Hemming v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
  5. Kiely v. RagaliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Bagley v. Controlled Environment Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  2. Fontaine v. CharasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1935
  3. Meador v. Hotel GroverMississippi Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Frost v. StevensSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
  5. Morris v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API