Morrison v. Boston & Maine Railroad
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
I. Regarding the motion for a directed verdict, the following facts may be stated. The decedent was driving a motor truck over a highway running northeasterly and was struck on a main track crossing by the defendant’s train traveling westerly. A side track some 8 feet southerly of the main track extended over the crossing, and some freight cars were standing on it. From the crossing to the nearer end of the nearest car was not less than 70 and not over 105 feet. These cars and a bush on premises south of the railroad obscured the view of the oncoming train given one traveling in the direction…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gahagan v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1900
- Collins v. HustisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1920
- Burke v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
- Morrell v. GobeilSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1929
- Morier v. HinesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1923
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Niemi v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934
- Adams v. SeveranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1945
- Bates v. Rutland Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1933
- Cyr v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
- Eastman v. HerrickSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.