Dillon v. Twin State Gas & Electric Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
The bridge was in the compact part of the city. It was in evidence that at one time the defendant’s construction foreman had complained to the city marshal about its use by boys as a playground and in his complaint had referred to the defendant’s wires. The only wires were those over the bridge superstructure. From this evidence and that relating to the extent of the practice for boys to climb up to and upon the horizontal girders an inference that the defendant had notice of the practice was reasonable. The occasion for the complaint might be found due to apprehension of danger from…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Humphrey v. Twin State Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1927
- Davoust v. City of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- B'ham Ry. L. & P. Co. v. CockrumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Benton v. North Carolina Public-Service Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Williams ex rel. Williams v. Springfield Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1918
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Gary C. Lancaster v. Norfolk and Western Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Hake v. Manchester TownshipSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Steinhauser v. Hertz Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Meyer v. Union RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Smith v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1935
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.