Legal Opinion

Vidal v. Errol

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided September 6, 1932PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

The plaintiff’s intestate met her death upon May 30, 1929, when the automobile in which she was riding was driven over the edge of an embankment alongside a highway in the town of Errol, and rolled into the Androscoggin river. The embankment which was “pretty steep” with a drop of six or eight feet to the river, was unrailed at the point of accident, and the absence of a railing was the defect of which the plaintiff complained. The accident happened late at night and a heavy fog prevailed at the time. There were five persons in the car, three young men and two girls, one of whom was the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Dudley v. Northampton Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Guille v. SwanNew York Supreme Court · 1822
  3. Doherty v. Inhabitants of AyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  4. Conroy v. MatherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. Balian v. OgassinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Marshall v. NugentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1955
  2. Roberts v. CraigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Papakalos v. ShakaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941
  4. Allen v. Dover Co-Recreational Softball LeagueSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  5. Clarence Shepard v. General Motors Corporation, David Shepard, by His Father and Next Friend Clarence Shepard v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API