Legal Opinion
In re Petrochina Co. Ltd. Securities Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 3, 2015No. Master File No. 13-cv-6180 (ER)PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
RAMOS, District Judgé:
This consolidated class action arises from an alleged bribery scheme at the Chinese oil and gas company, PetroChina Company, Ltd. (“PetroChina” or “the Compan/’) during the period between April 26, 2012 and December 17, 2013 (the “class period”). According to the Second Amended Class' Action Complaint (“SAC”), during the class period, PetroChina falsely *348claimed to have adequate internal controls, while representing that it was complying with applicable laws and regulations and maintaining high standards of corporate governance and ethics.' Lead…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- In re Banco Bradesco S.A. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- In re Braskem S.A. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Das v. Rio Tinto PLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- In re Sanofi Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Gagnon v. Alkermes PLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.