Legal Opinion
In re Sanofi Securities Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 6, 2016No. 14-cv-9624 (PKC)PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*391MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Castel, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs Meitav DS Provident Funds and Pension Ltd. (“Meitav”) and Joel Mof-senson bring this putative class action on behalf of all persons who purchased Sanofl American Depositary Shares (“ADS”) between February 7, 2013 and October 29, 2014 (the “Class Period”). They allege that defendants Sanofi and its former Chief Executive Officer Christopher Viehbacher violated section 10(b), Rule 10b-5, and section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) when they misstated and omitted material information regarding…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Doubleline Capital LP v. Odebrecht Fin., Ltd.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- In re Banco Bradesco S.A. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Das v. Rio Tinto PLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- In re Investment Technology Group, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- In re Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.