Legal Opinion
Das v. Rio Tinto PLC
District Court, S.D. Illinois
Decided August 31, 2018No. 16-cv-09572 (ALC)PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., United States District Judge:
*796On behalf of a putative class consisting of purchasers of American Depositary Receipts ("ADRs") between March 16, 2012 and November 17, 2016, Lead Plaintiff Puranjay Das ("Plaintiff") brings this action against Defendants Rio Tinto plc ("Rio Tinto" or "the Company") as well as Tom Albanese, Alan Davies, and Sam Walsh ("Individual Defendants"), asserting claims of securities fraud under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act"). Defendants have moved to dismiss this action for failure to state a claim…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Baliga ex rel. Link Motion Inc. v. Link Motion Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Zhong Zheng v. Pingtan Marine Enter. Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 2019
- Amorosa v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Arora v. HDFC Bank LimitedDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023
- Batter v. Hecla Mining CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.