Legal Opinion

Boland v. Morrill

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 8, 1965No. 39320PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knutson, Chief Justice.

This case arises out of a collision between an automobile driven by Lee Boland, in which plaintiff, Mabel Boland, was riding as a passenger, and an automobile driven by Charles Henry Morrill. The case was submitted to the jury on a special verdict. The jury found that both drivers were guilty of negligence; that the negligence of Charles Henry Morrill was a proximate cause of the accident; and that the negligence of Boland was not. After denial of a post-trial motion for judgment notwithstanding the findings of fact of the court made pursuant to the jury’s verdict or in…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Morier v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  2. Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  3. Frankle v. TwedtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  4. Wilson v. SorgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  5. Saint Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co. v. St. Joseph's HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. Edgewater Motels, Inc. v. GatzkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Lange v. National Biscuit CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  4. Weinberger v. Maplewood ReviewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  5. State v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API