McKay's Family Dodge v. Hardrives, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Appellant challenges the trial court refusal to grant its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or alternatively a motion for new trial based upon alleged insufficient evidence, admission of improper evidence, and refusal to instruct the jury on the issue of contributory negligence. Appellant also claims that the trial court erred in its award of prejudgment interest. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.
FACTS
Appellant Hardrives, Inc. is a Minnesota corporation which owns and operates an asphalt recycling plant in St. Cloud, Minnesota. Respondent…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sandhofer v. Abbott-Northwestern HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Lamb v. JordanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Lines v. RyanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Raleigh Ex Rel. Raleigh v. Independent School District No. 625Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Tomfohr v. Mayo FoundationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bertram v. PooleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Krutsch v. Walter H. Collin GmBh Verfahrenstechnik Und MaschinenfabricCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Knuth Ex Rel. Knuth v. Emergency Care Consultants, P.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- In Re BuckmasterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- United Products Corp. v. Atlas Auto PartsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.