Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Vana v. Maple Heights City Council

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1990No. 89-160PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

In the case before us, appellant Zgrabik concedes that Section 4, Article III of the Maple Heights Charter prohibits him from holding office. He contends, however, that this provision violates the Equal Protection Clauses of the Ohio and United States Constitutions because it lacks a rational basis and infringes on rights of political expression. Since Zgrabik challenges the charter classification under the Equal Protection Clauses, we must first determine the appropriate standard of review.

Legislation enacted by a municipality ordinarily is presumed to be valid and the enacting body is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bullock v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. McDonald v. Board of Election Comm'rs of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Clements v. FashingSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Menefee v. Queen City MetroOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State ex rel. Keefe v. EyrichOhio Supreme Court · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Painter v. GraleyOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. WardOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Roseman v. Firemen & Policemen's Death Benefit FundOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API