Legal Opinion

Bullock v. Carter

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 24, 1972No. 70-128PublishedCited by 1,286 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Burger

Under Texas law, a candidate must pay a filing fee as a condition to having his name placed on the ballot in a primary election. The constitutionality of the Texas filing-fee system is the subject of this appeal from the judgment of a three-judge District Court.

Appellee Pate met all qualifications to be a candidate in the May 2, 1970, Democratic primary for the office of County Commissioner of Precinct Four for El Paso County, except that he was unable to pay the $1,424.60 assessment required of candidates in that pri mary. Appellee Wischkaemper sought to be placed on the Democratic primary…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Williams v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,286 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

1,281 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API