Legal Opinion

Roseman v. Firemen & Policemen's Death Benefit Fund

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1993No. 92-777PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.

This case presents one issue: Does that part of R.C. 742.63, specifically R.C. 742.63(H), which provides that benefit amounts paid from the fund to a survivor shall not be adjusted when another survivor’s benefit is terminated or reduced, violate the Equal Protection Clauses of the Ohio and United States Constitutions? 1 For the reasons which follow, we find that R.C. 742.63(H) violates appellee’s equal protection rights. We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

The fund is created by R.C. 742.61. Benefits paid from the fund come from money provided by the state (and from any gifts made…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Clements v. FashingSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Gaines v. Preterm-Cleveland, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Menefee v. Queen City MetroOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Sedar v. Knowlton Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Holeton v. Crouse Cartage Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. City of Cleveland v. TrzebuckowskiOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State ex rel. Solomon v. Board of Trustees of the Police & Firemen's Disability & Pension FundOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. Mole (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Adamsky v. Buckeye Local School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1995

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API