Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Prezioso

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 13, 1944No. Appeal, 114PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

IIirt, J.,

The defendant, with George Sarkis, Lucy Torchia and Joseph Torino, was charged with conducting a ‘numbers’ lottery. The three pleaded guilty to the charge; defendant alone stood trial. He was convicted and sentenced. As appellant, he contends that the evidence as a whole is not sufficient to warrant his conviction; he also charges trial errors in seeking a new trial.

Sarkis lived at 1219 Epiphany Street in Pittsburgh; Lucy Torchia, his sister-in-law, was a member of his family. Defendant lived two doors away at 1225 Epiphany Street in a house owned by him. Joseph Totino…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LibonatiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Commonwealth v. MarinoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Commonwealth v. Dee PetroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Commonwealth v. ByersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  5. Fairmount Engine Co. v. Montgomery CountySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ParenteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Commonwealth v. DiSilvioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. GurreriSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Commonwealth v. SchultzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API