Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. DiSilvio

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 27, 1975No. Appeal, 444PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Jacobs, J.,

This appeal challenges the admissibility of evidence obtained by police officers answering the appellant’s telephone during an authorized search of his premises. The appellant contends that the information elicited from the callers was obtained in violation of Pennsylvania’s anti-wiretapping statute as it stood in 1972 when the search took place. 1 We hold that the actions of the police in answering the telephone did not constitute an interception of a communication such as is prohibited by the Act of July 16, 1957, the law in effect when the search took place, and the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Commonwealth v. FortuneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Commonwealth v. MurraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Commonwealth v. GullettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. Fred "Freddy Campo" Campagnuolo, John "Jackie Campo" Campagnuolo, and Michael "Mike Douglas" GougulesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. ProettoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Bachman v. ArtingerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. ArcherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API