Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Marino

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 8, 1940No. Appeal, 174PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Keller, P. J.,

Opinion by

The disposition of this appeal requires consideration of the Act of June 5, 1937, P. L. 1703, entitled “An act relating to criminal prosecutions; limiting the effect of demu'rrers by defendants at the close of the cases of the Commonwealth.” The act is printed in the margin.

Before the passage of this act, when a defendant demurred to the evidence at the close of the Commonwealth’s case, it did not become effective unless the Commonwealth joined in the demurrer, either expressly 2 or tacitly, by necessary implication. 3

If joined in by the Commonwealth, the effect of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ErnestoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Commonwealth v. ByersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  3. Commonwealth of Pa. v. KolskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Commonwealth v. BanksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Hutchison & Batchelder v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KloiberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Commonwealth v. LibonatiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Commonwealth v. NasutiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Commonwealth v. BausewineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Commonwealth v. WentzelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API