Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Dee Petro

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 26, 1944No. Appeals, 189 and 190PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Maxey,

This , case originated in indictments for arson, and the burning of a dwelling house and for aiding, counselling and procuring the burning of property with intent to defraud an insurer. Those indicted were James De Petro and Verna De Petro, his wife, and the latter’s brother, Anthony Montonaro. The defendants were all found guilty and James De Petro and Tony Montonaro were each sentenced to pay the costs of prosecution and to undergo imprisonment in the County Jail: the former for a period of not less than two and one-half years nor more than five years; the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LibonatiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Commonwealth v. LettrichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Commonwealth v. HarmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1846
  4. Commonwealth v. HoltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Brown v. SchockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BuehlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. GarrettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Commonwealth v. BlevinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Commonwealth v. DickersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Commonwealth v. NasutiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API