Legal Opinion

Bar & Barbeque Products, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 16, 1978No. C.D. 4730; Court No. 75-4-00845Published

1Opinion of the Court

Boe,- Judge:

Before the court for determination are plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and defendant’s cross-motion to dismiss on the jurisdictional ground that the plaintiff was not the proper party to file the protest.1

*14The controversy underlying this action concerns the proper classification of battery-operated slot machines. The articles were classified under item 737.40, TSUS, as modified by Presidential Proclamation 3822, T.D. 68-9, with duty at the rate of 17.5% ad valorem. Plaintiff claims that the merchandise is properly classifiable under item 734.20, TSUS, as modified, with a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Patchogue-Plymouth Mills Corporation v. DurningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  2. United States v. Wedemann & Godknecht, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
  3. Hancock Gross Mfg., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
  4. Baylis Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
  5. John H. Faunce Phila., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API