Baylis Bros. v. United States

Ford, Judge:

Pursuant to rule 8.2 of the rules of the court, plaintiffs have moved for summary judgment. Defendant has filed opposition thereto on the ground the court lacks jurisdiction since the parties instituting the action are not included in section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as being entitled to file.

*90There is no issue as to the merits of these cases which have previously been determined in United States v. Baylis Brothers Co., 59 CCPA 9, C.A.D. 1026, 451 F. 2d 643 (1971). Defendant has conceded in its answer that the fabric components of the dress fronts are entitled to the allowance…