Patchogue-Plymouth Mills Corporation v. Durning
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CHASE, Circuit Judge.
Certain imported wools were withdrawn by the plaintiff from a bonded warehouse between September 3, 1927 and June 17, 1929. The plaintiff used them in the manufacture of yarns which it in turn used to manufacture carpets. The tariff acts of 1922 and 1930, 42 Stat. 904, § 1, par. 1101; 46 Stat. 646, par. 1101, 19 U.S.C.A. § 1001, par. 1101, provided for the remission or refund of such duties “if within three years from the date of importation or withdrawal from bonded warehouse satisfactory proof is furnished that the wools * * * have been used in the manufacture of yarns…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Sherman & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Cottman Co. v. DaileyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
- Riccomini v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
3Cited by21 opinions
- Argosy Limited v. Franklin Hennigan, Individually and as Acting District Director of CustomsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Sneaker Circus, Inc. v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Croton Watch Co., Inc. v. LaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Horton v. HumphreyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1956
- SCM Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.