Legal Opinion

United States v. Wedemann & Godknecht, Inc.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 15, 1975No. 74-25, C.A.D. 1151PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rich , Judge.

This appeal is from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, Second Division,1 sustaining protests to the classification of certain synthetic filaments manufactured in Germany by Farben-fabriken Bayer, A.G. (hereinafter FFB), and sold to domestic customers on a duty-paid delivered basis.

The merits of the classification issue were initially determined in Wedemann & Godknecht, Inc., a/c Burlington Industries, Inc. v. United States, 59 Cust. Ct. 475, C.D. 3199, 275 F. Supp. 1017 (1967). However, a question of the jurisdiction of the court to render a decision came up, based…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Eaton Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  2. Wells v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  3. Wedemann & Godknecht, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  4. Wedemann & Godknecht, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
  5. Wedemann & Godknecht, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. E.C. McAfee A/c Bristol Metal Industries of Canada Ltd. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  2. South African Marine Corp., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  3. Pasco Terminals, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
  4. Hancock Gross Mfg., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
  5. Creative Playthings, Division of CBS, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API