United States v. Wedemann & Godknecht, Inc.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Rich , Judge.
This appeal is from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, Second Division,1 sustaining protests to the classification of certain synthetic filaments manufactured in Germany by Farben-fabriken Bayer, A.G. (hereinafter FFB), and sold to domestic customers on a duty-paid delivered basis.
The merits of the classification issue were initially determined in Wedemann & Godknecht, Inc., a/c Burlington Industries, Inc. v. United States, 59 Cust. Ct. 475, C.D. 3199, 275 F. Supp. 1017 (1967). However, a question of the jurisdiction of the court to render a decision came up, based…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Eaton Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- Wells v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
- Wedemann & Godknecht, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Wedemann & Godknecht, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
- Wedemann & Godknecht, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
3Cited by7 opinions
- E.C. McAfee A/c Bristol Metal Industries of Canada Ltd. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- South African Marine Corp., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Pasco Terminals, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
- Hancock Gross Mfg., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
- Creative Playthings, Division of CBS, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.