Hancock Gross Mfg., Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND PLAINTIFF’S CROSS-MOTION TO CORRECT ITS NAME
NEWMAN, Judge:
Pursuant to rule 4.7(b)(1) of this court defendant has moved to dismiss these two protests on the ground that plaintiff is not a proper party and has no standing to file the actions. In response to defendant’s motion, plaintiff has filed an opposition, and a cross-motion to change the plaintiff-corporate name in these cases from Hancock Gross Mfg., Inc. to Hancock-Gross, Inc. Defendant has opposed the cross-motion.
It is abundantly clear that defendant’s motion should be denied, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. FieldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- Gray v. LawrenceU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1853
- United States v. Wedemann & Godknecht, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
- Mason v. KaneU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maryland · 1851
- Top Form Brassiere Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mitchell Food Products, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Prestigeline v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
- Cheng Shin Rubber Industry Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982
- Mohawk Recreation Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
- Bar & Barbeque Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978