Legal Opinion

Appeal of Beyer

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 5, 1982No. 81-174PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKing, C.J.

Dr. Werner Beyer, a dentist in Nashua, New Hampshire, appeals a decision by the New Hampshire Board of Dental Examiners (board) to suspend his license to practice for thirty days and require him to attend continuing education classes. We affirm.

On August 29, 1978, James V. Bowles and Judith H. Bowles filed a complaint against Dr. Beyer with the New Hampshire Dental Society (society). Their complaint alleged that Dr. Beyer had negligently placed an implant in their daughter’s mouth and had failed to warn them of the risks of the implant. Because Dr. Beyer refused to participate in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Bricker v. CraneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  3. Scarborough v. ArnoldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  4. Provencal v. ProvencalSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  5. Folger v. CorbettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Martin v. SizemoreCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  2. Levinson v. Connecticut Board of Chiropractic ExaminersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. In re GrimmSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  4. Appeal of SchrammSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Appeal of PlantierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API