Legal Opinion
Appeal of Schramm
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 14, 1987No. 15588PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERTSON, Circuit Judge.
ISSUE PRESENTED
Pursuant to SDCL Ch. 36-8, the South Dakota State Board of Dentistry suspended the license of appellant to practice dentistry in South Dakota for an indefinite period upon a finding of “unacceptable patient care due to his deliberate or negligent act or acts or failure to act.” Appellant seeks reversal on the grounds that at his hearing, the Board of Dentistry had no expert testimony before it as to the appropriate standard of care required of dentists in areas similar to appellants and that he intentionally or negligently violated that standard. The…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Greene v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Martinmaas v. EngelmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Martin v. SizemoreCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
- US West Communications, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Levinson v. Connecticut Board of Chiropractic ExaminersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Rushmore State Bank v. Kurylas, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.