Legal Opinion
Scarborough v. Arnold
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided October 24, 1977No. 7682PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an appeal pursuant to RSA 354-A: 10 from a finding by the New Hampshire Commission for Human Rights. The Superior Court (Keller, C.J.) approved the Master’s (Robert A. Carignan, Esq.) report. A ruling on a motion for clarification on the issue of damages was approved and defendant’s exceptions were reserved and transferred by Flynn, J.
The defendant, Robert Arnold, owns, manages and operates a restaurant in Concord, New Hampshire. The plaintiff, Susan Scarborough, was one of fifteen to twenty persons who applied to Mr. Arnold for an advertised position of “management trainee.” The ad…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Nancy A. GILLIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERAL PAPER BOARD COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Society for the Protection of New Hampshire Forests v. Site Evaluation CommitteeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
- Foote v. State Personnel CommissionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Caouette v. OfficeMax, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2005
- Appeal of The Portsmouth Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- New Hampshire Department of Revenue Administration v. Public Employee Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Bowles v. KeatingIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.