Legal Opinion

Folger v. Corbett

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 30, 1978No. 78-151PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The principal issue in this case is whether it is necessary for the plaintiff to produce expert testimony on the issue of informed consent. The defendant’s motion for a nonsuit was granted at the close of plaintiff’s case. Plaintiff’s exceptions to the granting of the motion and an evidentiary ruling were reserved and transferred by the Trial Court (Cann, J.).

The defendant oral surgeon had removed the plaintiff’s four wisdom teeth without complication in January 1972. Afterwards plaintiff felt a numbness on the right side of her tongue as a result of damage to her lingual nerve. At trial she…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mehigan v. SheehanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1947
  2. Laird v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1922
  3. Guarracino v. BeaudrySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  4. April v. PerontSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
  5. Ordway v. HaynesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1870

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Carson v. MaurerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  2. Harnish v. Children's Hospital Medical CenterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Phillips by and Through Phillips v. HullMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Smith v. CoteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  5. Woolley v. HendersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API