In the Disciplinary Matter Involving Wiederholt
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
The Disciplinary Board has recommended that attorney Jon E. Wiederholt be disbarred because, in one ease, he filed a pleading and affidavit stating that his client’s judgment had not been satisfied when he knew that the judgment had been satisfied, and, in another case, he forged his client’s signature as an endorsement to a check. Having independently reviewed the evidence presented before the Hearing Committee, we agree with the factual findings of the Disciplinary Board, and accept the recommendation that Wiederholt be disbarred.
II. BACKGROUND
Presente…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Office of the Disciplinary Counsel v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- In the Disciplinary Matter Involving BuckalewAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Matter of CrumpackerIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- In Re the Disciplinary Matter Involving SimpsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- In the Disciplinary Matter Involving SchulerAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In the Disciplinary Matter of FriedmanAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- In the Disciplinary Matter Involving TriemAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re the Reinstatement of WiederholtAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- In the Disciplinary Matter Involving BrionAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re the Reinstatement of WiederholtAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.