Legal Opinion

In Re the Reinstatement of Wiederholt

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 2004No. S-10528PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order

Petition for Reinstatement

IT IS ORDERED:

For the reasons stated in the Disciplinary Board’s recommendation entered May 12, 2003, attached to this order as Attachment A, the Petition of Jon E. Wiederholt for Reinstatement to the practice of law is Denied.

BRYNER, Chief Justice, and EASTAUGH, Justice, not participating.

CARPENETI, Justice, dissents and would grant the petition for the reasons set forth in his attached dissenting statement.

ATTACHMENT A

BEFORE THE ALASKA BAR ASSOCIATION

DISCIPLINARY BOARD

In The Reinstatement Matter Involving

Jon E. Widerholt, Petitioner.

ABA Membership No. 8312172…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. ChaneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Petition of PierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In Re MonaghanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1966
  4. Spenard Action Committee v. Lot 3, Block 1, Evergreen SubdivisionAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. DeNuptiis v. Unocal Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Adkins v. CollensAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  2. In the Reinstatement Matter Involving WiederholtAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  3. In the Reinstatement Matter Involving WiederholtAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Gregory Marino v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2025
  5. In Re the Reinstatement of WiederholtAlaska Supreme Court · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API