State v. Heger
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction.— Son. C. Orrick Bishop, Judge. Under the agreed statement of facts, it is- shown that one bird was killed in the State of Missouri, in open season, and purchased and came into the possession of defendant in the open season; that the other bird was killed in the Territory of Oklahoma, and the duck in the State of Texas, and the second dnck in the State of Arkansas, during the open seasons in said States and Territory, as…
Read the full summary
Appeal from St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction.— Son. C. Orrick Bishop, Judge. Under the agreed statement of facts, it is- shown that one bird was killed in the State of Missouri, in open season, and purchased and came into the possession of defendant in the open season; that the other bird was killed in the Territory of Oklahoma, and the duck in the State of Texas, and the second dnck in the State of Arkansas, during the open seasons in said States and Territory, as provided by the law of said States and Territory, and that they were purchased by the defendant during said open seasons.…
1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, P. J.
This is a prosecution upon an information filed against the defendant for a violation of section 18 of the Act of March 10, 1905, for the preservation of game and fish. The information was filed in the court of criminal correction of the city of St. Louis, on June 30,1905, and charges that the defendant, Fred Heger, on June 27,1905, did willfully and unlawfully sell to one H. "VY. Kuehans, in the city of St. Louis, Missouri, certain game birds, to-wit, one quail, one grouse, one teal duck and one mallard duck, which said birds had been killed without the State of Missouri, and shipped into…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Geer v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- In Re RahrerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Ex parte MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Phelps v. . RaceyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- State v. RodmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gratz v. McKeeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
- Ex Parte BlardoneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
- People v. ZimbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- United States v. McCullaghDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1915
- State v. BennettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.