Legal Opinion
United States v. McCullagh
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 20, 1915No. Nos. 4196-4198PublishedCited by 10 opinions
George I,. McCullagh, one Savage, and one Sapp were informed against for an offense. On demurrer to the information.
1Opinion of the Court
POLLOCK, District Judge.
The information filed against defendant in this case reads as follows:
“Comes now Fred Robertson, United States attorney for the district of Kansas, leave of court having first been obtained and by authority and direction of the Attorney General gives the court to understand and be informed, upon the oath of A. S. Riekner, a federal game warden for the United States Department of Agriculture, that in the county of Cherokee, in the Third division of Ihe district of Kansas and within the jurisdiction of this court, one George L. McCullagh did then and there, on or about…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Bank of Columbia v. OkelySupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Geer v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cochrane v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
- Young v. Kellex CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1948
- Bogle v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
- Kelleher v. SchoeneDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1926
- State v. SawyerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.