Ex parte Maier
California Supreme Court
Hearing in the Supreme Court upon writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.
Petitioner was arrested and is held ip restraint under a warrant issued out of the police court of the city of Los Angeles, based on a complaint charging him, under section 626 of the Penal Code, with unlawfully selling on the eighteenth day of December, 1893, at said city, a quantity of deer meat, which meat the complaint alleges “ was then and there by said Simon Maier, cut from the carcass of an entire deer, which said deer had been theretofore brought by said Simon Maier from the state of Texas, in which state said deer had been lawfully killed.” Petitioner asks for his discharge on…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Leisy v. HardinSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Thurlow v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
- Railroad Co. v. HusenSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Bowman v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Thorpe v. Rutland & Burlington RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1854
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by112 opinions
- Bilida v. McCleodCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Harper v. GallowaySupreme Court of Florida · 1909
- People v. Truckee Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- In Re RamerizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- In Re SumidaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.