State v. Bennett
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
An amended information was filed charging that defendant, having procured a hunter's license in Benton County, refused to permit the deputy game-and-fish commissioner to inspect and count the number of quail in defendant's possession on November 10, 1925. The court sustained a motion to quash the information on the grounds that Section 5645, Revised Statutes 1919, is in conflict with the provisions of Sections 11 and 23 of Article 2 of the Constitution of Missouri; that it "deprives the defendant of the equal protection of the law," and because the information does not state facts sufficient…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Geer v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Duncan v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- New York Ex Rel. Silz v. HesterbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Ex parte MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- People Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Lansing Municipal JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
- State v. WardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- St. Louis Public Service Company v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- American Railway Express Co. v. Fleishman, Morris & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.