Legal Opinion

State v. Bennett

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 23, 1926PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

An amended information was filed charging that defendant, having procured a hunter's license in Benton County, refused to permit the deputy game-and-fish commissioner to inspect and count the number of quail in defendant's possession on November 10, 1925. The court sustained a motion to quash the information on the grounds that Section 5645, Revised Statutes 1919, is in conflict with the provisions of Sections 11 and 23 of Article 2 of the Constitution of Missouri; that it "deprives the defendant of the equal protection of the law," and because the information does not state facts sufficient…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Geer v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Duncan v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. New York Ex Rel. Silz v. HesterbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Ex parte MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. People Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Lansing Municipal JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  3. State v. WardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  4. St. Louis Public Service Company v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  5. American Railway Express Co. v. Fleishman, Morris & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API