State v. Johnson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtPless, J.
The three appealing defendants have filed one case on appeal and one brief. The errors assigned in behalf of Hollings-worth and Purcell deal with “leading questions” which the defendants alleged were permitted by the Court. These questions are not brought forth in the brief, and we are required to go upon a voyage of discovery to locate them. Having done so, we find that-they refer largely to the testimony of McCoy and that they are merely directing his attention to the feature of the case about which he was then being examined.
The defendants have several exceptions to the “leading questions”…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. TaftSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- State v. CranfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- McKay v. . BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. HairstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. RankinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. FosterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.