State v. Rankin
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
LAKE, Justice.
The serious question presented by this appeal is whether the evidence for the State is sufficient to withstand this appellant’s motion for judgment of nonsuit (Assignment of Error No. 3). Like the Superior Court and the majority of the Court of Appeals, we hold that it is.
As Justice Parker, later Chief Justice, said in State v. Taft, 256 N.C. 441, 124 S.E. 2d 169, “It is thoroughly established law in this State that, without regard to any previous confederation or design, when two or more persons aid and abet each other in the commission of a crime, all being present, all are…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. Jarrell.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- State v. HargettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- State v. WitherspoonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. HunterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. GoodeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.