Legal Opinion

State v. Cranfield

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 12, 1953No. 722PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.

Appellant, the defendant, brings forward several assignments of error, — but, after careful consideration of them, prejudicial error is not made to appear. However, this Court will treat such of the assignments of error so presented as it is deemed to be required.

Assignments of error numbered 7 and 9 are based upon exceptions numbered 7 and 15, to denial of motions aptly made for judgment as of nonsuit, pursuant to G.S. 15-113.

In this connection it is appropriate to note that the two counts in the bills of indictment on which these prosecutions are founded are in conformity with the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barnes v. . CrawfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  2. State v. . BuckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. State v. . HargroveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. State v. BuckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. State v. NoellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API