State v. Foster
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
SHARP, Chief Justice.
Defendant brings forward seven assignments of error. We consider first his assignment No. 4, which is the basis for his assertion that “the major question presented by this appeal” is whether the trial judge erred in refusing to direct a verdict of not guilty as to defendant Foster after the jury had acquitted defendant Boulware. Defendant Foster stresses the fact that although the State’s case against both defendants Foster and Boulware depended upon the testimony of Martin, who implicated them both in the attempted robbery, the jury acquitted Boulware and “convicted…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. McKennaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. GaineySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. MurraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. CallowaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Osborn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.