Legal Opinion

State v. Wright

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 13, 1972No. 50PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

Detective J. 0. Stoudenmire testified without objection that after his arrest Wright told him that he overheard a conversation at the bus station between Chavis and Glenn in which they discussed robbing a taxi driver. On cross-examination Stoudenmire testified over Glenn’s objection that Wright said Glenn and Chavis had talked about robbing a cab driver. Glenn contends that it was error to allow this testimony since it relates to a statement by a codefendant which implicates Glenn in the crime, citing Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 20 L.Ed. 2d 476, 88 S.Ct. 1620 (1968);…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Roberts v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. FoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. BrowerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. State v. LevanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  5. State v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API