Legal Opinion

State v. Hairston

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 14, 1972No. 130PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOOEE, Justice.

On appeal defendants set forth 21 assignments of error. Assignments Nos. 3, 11, 12 and 18 are not discussed in defend ants’ briefs and are therefore deemed abandoned. Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 254 N.C. 783, 810 (1961). Nevertheless, since these are capital cases, these assignments have been carefully considered and found to be without merit.

Defendant McIntyre first assigns as error the court’s failure to provide him with counsel at the preliminary hearing. On 8 March 1971 McIntyre appeared before Judge Sherk of the District Court for a hearing to…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Moore v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. HutchinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. IrwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. JerrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API