Legal Opinion

Glinski v. Glinski

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 11, 1992No. 10143PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.

The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court, denying his motion to modify his obligation to pay child support and ordering a reduction, rather than a suspension, of his obligation to pay alimony. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.1

The plaintiff is an American citizen and a resident of this state. On June 10, 1987, the plaintiff married the defendant, then a citizen of Poland residing in New Britain, who had applied for American citizenship. A child was bom to the parties during their marriage. On October 1,1990, the parties’ marriage was dissolved. Pursuant to the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Koizim v. KoizimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  3. Leo v. LeoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. Scoville v. ScovilleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  5. Lashgari v. LashgariSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Denley v. DenleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  2. Schorsch v. SchorschConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  3. Clark v. ClarkConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. Hill v. HillConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  5. Brewer v. GutierrezConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API